Paul Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > How does everyone want to handle versioning GNU Classpath?
>
> In the same way that all other GNU packages handle versioning.
> The maintainer's guide mentions the correct way to version beta
> releases and pretests.
>
> > Linux style (odd is devel, even is production, we'll start at
> > 0.9.00?)
>
> No.
>
> > Or major.minor.feature.bugfix => 0.0.0.0
>
> Something along this line is fine. Most GNU programs use a versioning
> system of `foo-M.N' or `foo-M.N.O'.
Yeah, I've read the same thing. How will the libraries be versioned?
Should they each have their own separate version number (as it is
now)? To me that doesn't make much sense given that we're not going
to be releasing GNU Classpath in pieces, but as a whole no matter
whether the end user just wants part or not.
Brian
--
|-------------------------------|Software Engineer
|Brian Jones |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |http://www.nortel.net
|http://www.classpath.org/ |------------------------------
