Paul Fisher wrote:
> I'm currently of the opinion that javax packages should not be
> included into Classpath.
>
> I'd like to get some feedback from other people on how they feel about
> this issue.
It is probably too early to include most javax packages as there are quite a
bit of them and we don't even have the based packages done yet.
I would like to see servlets included though because that is probably the
most popular standard extension, and is not large or unmanageable.
I checked the JDK 1.2 and the rt.jar file at least the accessibility API
extension is included there included. We might want to include that one as
well for compatibility.
--
Aaron M. Renn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.urbanophile.com/arenn/
