Thomas J Lukasik wrote:
> it certainly **is** arrogant to think that they own the three letters 'GNU'.
How can anyone own anything that's just a bunch of symbols? A word, say, or
perhaps a computer program? A programming language? I don't think anyone is
arguing that the abstract, conceptual entity known as the Free Software
Foundation owns, or even CAN own, such an abstract, conceptual entity as a
namespace -- in fact quite the opposite.
I'm for using gnu.* because it makes opaque the irrelevance of ownership.
Cheers,
Wes
