"John Keiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That's fine ... the main question is, though, do you think the > requirements outlined above constitute a beta or an alpha? Calling it an alpha or beta is really arbitrary. The version number will be 0.x, where `x' will probably be 1. The release will be put up for ftp on alpha.gnu.org. > And we don't automatically generate JavaDoc, but we are in a special > position in that Java is already very well documented and at this > stage we're just replicating, not innovating. Java does not have good free manuals. Free software needs good free documentation <URL:http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-doc.html>. You can expect me to work heavily on the free documentation side of things once we replace Sun's proprietary libraries. -- Paul Fisher * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Japhar+Classpath patch on web! John Keiser
- Re: Japhar+Classpath patch on web! Paul Fisher
- I just tried to compile the CVS code (help) Moses DeJong
- RE: I just tried to compile the CVS code (hel... John Keiser
- RE: I just tried to compile the CVS code (hel... John Keiser
- Re: I just tried to compile the CVS code ... Brian Jones
- Goals for First Alpha Release John Keiser
- Re: Goals for First Alpha Releas... Brian Jones
- RE: Goals for First Alpha Re... John Keiser
- Re: Goals for First Alph... Paul Fisher
- Re: Goals for First Alph... Tommy Reilly
- Can not compile classpath from CVS. Moses DeJong
- Re: Can not compile classpath from CVS. Brian Jones
- Re: Japhar+Classpath patch on web! Petter Reinholdtsen
- Re: Japhar+Classpath patch on web! Petter Reinholdtsen
- RE: Japhar+Classpath patch on web! John Keiser
- Re: Japhar+Classpath patch on web! Chris Toshok
- RE: Japhar+Classpath patch on web! John Keiser
- Re: Japhar+Classpath patch on we... Brian Jones
- Re: Japhar+Classpath patch on we... Brian Jones

