Heh, I don't know yet.
The newer version is much simpler so it should work even better, but I
haven't tested it extensively except to verify that it compiles and that it
is usable (you can compile it into your source).
I'll send 'em off to you in a separate email so I don't clutter the list.
--John Keiser
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernd Kreimeier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 1998 6:51 AM
> To: John Keiser
> Cc: Classpath
> Subject: RE: jnilink enhancements
>
>
> John Keiser writes:
> > In short, yes, once I put the LGPL copyright notice in
> there (which I
> > haven't yet) it is usable for anyone. I'll send you a copy tonight or
> > tomorrow once I slap those headers on. I don't think
> anonymous CVS access
> > is set up yet, unfortunately :(
>
> Appreciated. If it is stable enough, maybe it warrants a
> separate jnilink-0.1.tgz tarball available by FTP?
>
> b.
>
>
