> Thomas Kuhn wrote:
> Well, do you think it is possible to port those Parts from JNI to CNI
> and to extract the AWT-Parts from the package
Mid term and long term, adding JNI support to gcj would be the
better idea IMO. Cygnus seems to consider likely that you
can get away with defines and macros for this purpose. Personally,
I doubt anything good will come out of pitching CNI against JNI.
b.
--
"Problem solving is hunting. It is savage pleasure,
and we are born to it." Thomas Harris, Silence of the Lambs
