On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Sorry, my bad. I meant the resulting Objects from some of the methods
> should be serializable but aren't at the moment.
Ok, I get it now. Ya'know it seems that almost every time I turn around I
run into something new/unexpected regarding serialization. So much is
underspecified or just plain not documented, that I've gotten used to
"expecting the unexpected" ;-).
> Thank you for your long explanation of things to do to get classes correctly
> serializable. It doesn't seem like a simple thing to do for all the
> (non-public) inner classes defined the Collections class. If I have some
> more time (which I haven't :) I will try to see what I can do about it.
No problem. Thanks go to you for doing what you've done. I certainly can
commiserate with you. When I took a look at the 1.3 doc for Collections
and serialization I thought "Oh, yuck".
Take care!
--warrenl
