Artur Biesiadowski wrote:
> I'm not sure if such constructs are best thing as far as readibility is
> concerned.
>
> lastReturned = previous = next;
>
> Maybe splitting them up would be better. Or is it only me that find
> myself puzzling half a minute which way it works ? :)
I'm inclined to agree with you. (Actually, I think that particular line
came from the existing implementation). I'll change it.
regards
[ bryce ]
_______________________________________________
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
