Tom Tromey wrote:
> I noticed that Brian regenerated ChangeLog using cvs2cl yesterday.
> This made it much less readable, imho.
I agree. Generated cvs changelogs suck. The main problem is that its
difficult to specify different text for different groups of changed files
without doing multiple check-ins. People also tend to write more interesting
and useful entries when the ChangeLog is maintained by hand.
1 vote for a hand maintained ChangeLog.
[ bryce ]
_______________________________________________
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
