Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm noticing some files are being checked in with a libgcj header
> which also mentions a LIBGCJ_LICENSE file. Since we don't have such a
> file the header is a bit confusing. This was probably just an
> oversight... but maybe dealing with these two different headers is
> confusing or difficult to manage on the libgcj end? Is there someone
> for us to do to make this easier?
Please read "Is there someone" above as "Is there someway", thanks.
--
Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
