Nic Ferrier wrote:
> I agree. The seperation of layers is really bad and they keep making
> changes... I think Sun's real problem is the JNI which is not very
> useful for client side Java (thank goodness for GCJ and CNI).
>
> Perhaps you guys would consider doing a Swing port for GCJ? Using low
> level stuff called from CNI when necessary?
It is sad that swing can be 100% java and CNI doesn't have to be used...
As far as JNI/CNI is concerned... I don't know what you mean by client
side java. Is JNI any better at server side ? Anyway, CNI is really nice
if you want to stick with gcc, but I personally prefer to write more
code in native wrappers than to stick to certain subset of garbage
collectors.
Artur
_______________________________________________
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
