> > Jochen has also completed a pure-java implementation of java.util.zip. I don't
>know if this will be the preferred implementation for classpath, but I suggest that
>it at least be a compile-time option.
> >
> > You can get the source and compiled classes at http://jazzlib.sourceforge.net/
>
> Yeah! This is great!
> I would love to have this as the default implementation in Classpath.
> Would there be any reason to not make the pure java version the default?
I don't see any. The code is functionally equivalent.
> > > If you want to contribute large (more then 10/20 lines) pieces of code
> > > you do have to sign over your copyright to the FSF. That way all Classpath
> > > code can be legally defended by the FSF.
> >
> > If the code mentioned above gets included in Classpath, then I will have to sign
>some documentation (even though I wrote only a fraction of the code).
> >
> > How do I go about doing this?
>
> Officially Paul Fisher <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> handles all FSF papers.
> Could you send him email to ask if he can send you the appropriate
> papers to sign.
Ok.
> Some quick questions:
> Was any code shared with the jcraft people?
No
> Do you have a record of all people that contributed to the code?
Jochen and myself.
Some of the code was originally from libgcj (I saw Tom Tromey's name).
> Is there a official ChangeLog file? (I can get most from CVS I suppose.)
I'm not sure.
John Leuner
--
_______________________________________________
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
