On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 08:20:01PM -0500, Aaron M. Renn wrote:
> Shane Nay ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > What's everyones vibe on Classpath's AWT? Would you like to see it fixed?,
> > would a fixed AWT be accepted into the core of GNUClasspath?
>
> Isn't Event a 1.0 class that was obsolted in 1.1? I'm pretty sure I didn't
> implement it.
Sounds unlikely. Surely ActionEvents etc all inherit from Event?
> The AWT code (with a very few exception) has all been banged in by yours
> truly. Paul Fisher also wrote a peer set for GTK+. The Classpath AWT
> is definitely not debugged, so there is a lot of opportunity to improve
> things.
>
> However, the situation is that RMS does not want to relicense the AWT
> code user the same terms as the rest of Classpath (GPL + Exception).
Why not?
John Leuner
_______________________________________________
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
