Re: Classpath future?

[Aaron M. Renn]

Etienne M. Gagnon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > As a GNU project, it is then appropriate for us to provide
> > a heightened level of support for that target environment, so long as
> > it doesn't preclude other people from using us.
> 
> This is fine, as long as you make sure JNI support doesn't lag behind, 
> and no classes are added with a CNI counterpart and no JNI counter part.

Right now it is just the opposite.  Classpath is 100% JNI.  The only
CNI code resides in the libgcj modules that have not been merged in.

-- 
Aaron M. Renn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.urbanophile.com/arenn/

_______________________________________________
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath