> > Isn't a signed fax legally binding?
>
> Do you mean a faxed signature, or a faxed document which signed and then
> snail-mailed?
Thanks for replying - I meant the former (the latter would be binding).
Common business practice (in Australia - and I thought internationally) was
to fax the signed document, and then follow it with the same, snail-mailed.
I like to think my orginal post was less ambiguous than the snippet that is
quote above - but maybe not!
Cheers,
Brendan
--
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] v: +61 (3) 9905 1502
Email is checked daily Phone is rarely attended
_______________________________________________
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
