On Jul 31, Paul Fisher wrote:
> Jochen Hoenicke wrote:
> > As far as I can see, there is no real java.util.zip implementation in
> > classpath yet, so do you agree if I just commit the content of jazzlib
> > to the classpath repository, overwriting the three small existing
> > classes?
>
> That's fine. As you commit files, could you please go through them and
> clean up the formatting some to match the rest of Classpath? From a
> quick look over the source this morning, I'm referring to things like
> spaces between method names and the following parens, and spaces between
> keywords (if, etc) and their following parens.
Okay, I committed the space-changes to the jazzlib repository. There
may be a few places left where spacing is not 100% correct, but I
think I corrected most.
On Jul 31, Aaron M. Renn wrote:
>
> Is Jazzlib 100% Java? If so, I would consider it superior to a native
> implementation, ceteris paribus.
Yes it is 100% Java.
Jochen
_______________________________________________
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
