On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:36:46AM -0400, Etienne M. Gagnon wrote:
> My proposal would simply be: as all we want it "to get rid of the LGPL
> minus the upgrade clause, why not license Classpath under the "LGPL +
> an exception about the upgrade clause"?
Obviously, I meant:
"all we want it to get rid of the upgrade clause of the LGPL".
Etienne
--
Etienne M. Gagnon http://www.info.uqam.ca/~egagnon/
SableVM: http://www.sablevm.org/
SableCC: http://www.sablecc.org/
_______________________________________________
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
