>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mark> Note that GCC 3.0.x ships with a partial AWT implementation Mark> under GPL+exception. Paul> The AWT files that are part of the GCC release are GPL'd. The Paul> licensing information at the top of such files is incorrect. This is RMS' claim, but that doesn't necessarily make it true. It has a sort of revisionist quality to it -- namely, nobody who worked on the libgcj AWT implementation was aware of this at the time. So even if his position is legally correct, morally it can't be. IMHO of course. Certainly if I had known he was planning to GPL this code, I would never have assigned it to the FSF. Tom _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
