Nic Ferrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Personally, I don't like Ant. It's not *free* software either. > > There's not much you can do with Ant that can't be done with Make > (given a little thought).
Last I checked this is quite true. > Ant is also very Java centric, Classpath has a lot of C (and C++ if we > include the GCJ stuff). Make is perfect for those languages. I think Ant could only be useful for Java. I would not want to use it for making shared libraries. > Brian, would you like to check out the Paperclips and Classpathx make > files? They use the the @filelist convieniance to facilitate better > make control over java projects. I'll do that. -- Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
