Hi, On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 22:19, Artur Biesiadowski wrote: > > Do you think that Buffers should be a part of classpath ? Or should they > be left for jvm implementors ? There is quite a lot of code there - all > kinds of wrapper classes, splitting, views etc. But on the other hand, > core get/set functions have to be really optimized for specific jvm...
All the publicly defined buffer classes are abstract anyway. So yes, I think all classes defined in the 1.4 api spec should be part of Classpath. We can even provide sample implementations of most of the non-abstract classes. But lets first write all the java code, most of it is infrastructure anyway. Then we can pester the VM writers to give us efficient optimized support. Cheers, Mark _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
