Cierniak, Michal wrote: >Brian Jones writes: > >>Bryce McKinlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>>I don't think it is neccessary to make it native. Method is already >>>part of the VM interface, so VMs can modify it or make it native as >>>they wish. I think the more conservative approach should be taken by >>>the default implementation. >>> >>It may be necessary to consider including an ORP vm directory >>or ask that the ORP team distribute these particular classes >>specific to ORP with ORP. >> > >But I thought that Bryce indicated in his message that he also liked the >patch submitted by Gansha. It sounds like this modification is useful for >both ORP and GCJ since they both have their own internal data structures to >represent a method. >
Right. Gansha's implementation should be the one that goes in vm/reference. It may not be optimal for all VMs, but it is always correct and most accurately matches the JDK spec, and it is the implementation required for both ORP and GCJ. regards Bryce. _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
