Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Do you plan to publish ECPerf results? If I remember correctly the > ECPerf benchmark specification is freely available but the actual > implementation has a nasty non-free license that even prevented you from > publishing results before submitting them to a committee first that > could veto any publication. It looked highly unfree which makes it not > something we would like to use. But maybe I am wrong.
ECPerf is the standard by which application servers are measured. For their purposes, comparing ORP+Classpath running JBoss vs. other VMs running JBoss is valid even if in the free software world we shrug off less than free software. > Getting JBoss/Tomcat working with Orp is a major achievement! You > probably had to use some non-free libraries to get it all running > though. If you have a list of external (non-free) libraries that were > needed then that could maybe be used by the GNU ClasspathX (extensions) > project <http://www.gnu.org/software/classpathx> to decide what to work > on first. I think we can figure this out. > Brian, I believe the last time the ORP team submitted patches all legal > issues were cleared so there is nothing preventing us from added the > code, correct? Mostly, it's an easy process they setup that requires their lawyer submit these to the FSF, and that's what we are waiting for. Brian -- Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
