Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I found this on the net: > > "Member declarations in an interface disallow the use of some > declaration modifiers; you cannot use transient, volatile, or > synchronized in a member declaration in an interface. Also, you may > not use the private and protected specifiers when declaring members > of an interface." > > http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/java/interpack/createinterface.html > > I think this implicitely means they are public.
Ofcourse, but java is a pedantic language... I haven't used the official SDK from Sun for a long time, but as far as I remember you should explicitely declare them "public" or the byte compiler started to curse on you :). Additionaly, java was never fond of the term impicitely and consider that ommiting the visibility modifier, means that methods/fields have *package* scope. -- Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? (Epicurus) _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
