Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 18:00, C. Scott Ananian wrote: > > The recent change to java.lang.String (aug 13, v1.50) add a call to > > Character.zeroBasedStringValue() which (inadvertently?) makes > > java.lang.Character part of the "CORE CLASS" initializers (because String > > is a core class, and the static initializer of String invokes a method in > > Character, causing the initialization of Character). Character should > > be either marked as a CORE CLASS or the shared method should be moved > > to java.lang.String. > > Thanks for catching that. I had tested it with Kissme that didn't seem > to have a problem with the initializer order. But I have committed your > patch since it makes the implementation behave as documented in > Runtime.java.
Did you move zeroBasedStringValue() too? Brian -- Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
