On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Andy Walter wrote: > I am no graphics specialist, so I can't tell. I'll ask our AWT developers > about that. However, I would expect that there are changes necessary in all > three implementations (Rudolph, Classpath, and our modified Rudolph), so > before going into technical details I wanted to know if all those groups are > interested in changing their stuff just for merging with the rest.
Yes, we are. Independent of any licensing discussions, we'd like to be able to share AWT peers for gtk, Qt, microwindows, GEM, whatever. If the interface is clean then having these peers as "external libraries" should not be a problem (for us or for FSF or for anyone). -- Chris Gray VM Architect, ACUNIA _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
