> On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 07:05:46PM +0000, John Leuner wrote: > > > I don't see why we should add overhead to all JVMs because of a single > > > JVM that does not correctly implements JNI. > >=20 > > It's not JNI that is the problem, it is the GC mechanism. > > Which means Kissme has a flawed JNI design ...
You are probably right ... > I do reiterate my suggestion to the Kissme team to merge their effort > with SableVM, which already has a robust and functional implementation > of such wrapers, as well as all the machinery for providing *precise* > garbage collection (i.e. GC maps, even for conveluted use of JSR/RET > within bytecode). How would you feel about incorporating Kissme's Orthogonal Persistence support into the SableVM? I can't speak for John, but Orthogonal Persistence in Java is my primary motivation for working on Kissme. -- Steve _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
