Norbert Frese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > i think it should be a 'gnu.javax' library, because the 'java.net' > library looks like it was designed for ip-sockets only. > please tell me, which package-name you would like - that i can start > converting the sources. > what do you think of the package name > > 'gnu.javax.net.afunix' > or > 'gnu.javax.net.uxlocal'?
I think Nic Ferrier maintains a list of gnu.* packages who is using them on the FSF java web page, maybe it fits in the gnu.inet namespace. None of the projects seem to be interested in using gnu.javax that I see listed there. http://www.gnu.org/software/java/packages.html > besides it would be nice to allow classpath-independent building of > the library - for using it with other vm's. i don't know about the > legal issues here - for instance with the name 'gnu' - would it be > possible to publish such a classpath-independent version via > sourceforge? Non-FSF projects can be hosted on Savannah. I wouldn't recommend Sourceforge. Brian -- Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.haphazard.org/~cbj/ _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
