Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 22:36, Brian Jones wrote: > > * Integrate any remaining patches on Savannah as needed. > > I still have some patches "claimed" but I got absorbed in gcc 3.3 > testing and didn't have time to do more merging. I am currently looking > at merging/fixing the ObjectStream classes between Classpath and libgcj > but ran out of time and I probably won't have time the rest of the week > to look after the JRVM patches. So feel free to analyze and/or patch the > remaining items.
I haven't gotten to this yet. The gjdoc, dist, and automake crap took me much longer than expected over the past few days. > > * Full javadoc generated by gjdoc available for general consumption. > > There is only one open issue here that I know of. The produced HTML > pages should contain the actual Copyright notice of the java files they > were produced from not just some generic blurb. This is easy to > implement for the GNU Classpath classes since they always have that > statement as the first comment block at the top of the file. In general > it will not be that easy to extract this info from the java source file. Some way of specifying copyright/footer on a per package/class basis would be great... but this appears to be added in the xsltproc step. I've ignored it for now but there is a notice to this affect that you describe on our website. I've just committed a large number of changes to finish bringing gjdoc generation into the build/dist mechanism, fix some broken things like DESTDIR, uninstall, and too many invocations of gen-classlist.sh. I think make distcheck almost works now (fails in distcleancheck), but it's not a big deal either way. Brian -- Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
