Unfortunately, that change is a workaround for a bug in our optimizing
compiler.  It should become unnecessary at  some point (i.e. I do intend to
ifx this problem) but it would be great if it could left in for now.

      Thanks,
            Julian



                                                                                       
               
                      Tom Tromey                                                       
               
                      <[EMAIL PROTECTED]        To:       Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>     
               
                      m>                       cc:       Classpath Discussion Mailing 
List            
                                                <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian 
Dolby/Watson/IBM@IBMUS    
                      01/06/03 05:03 PM        Subject:  Re: classpath ./ChangeLog 
./THANKYOU         
                      Please respond to         java/util/Reso...                      
               
                      tromey                                                           
               
                                                                                       
               
                                                                                       
               




>>>>> "Brian" == Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Brian> This is true, but the code is harmless and I was inclined to
Brian> believe necessary for JRVM for some reason.  If it isn't needed
Brian> (Dolby?) then surely revert that part.

I've got the patch here.  I'll check it in after a couple days if I
don't hear anything.

Tom





_______________________________________________
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath

Reply via email to