Unfortunately, that change is a workaround for a bug in our optimizing
compiler. It should become unnecessary at some point (i.e. I do intend to
ifx this problem) but it would be great if it could left in for now.
Thanks,
Julian
Tom Tromey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
m> cc: Classpath Discussion Mailing
List
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian
Dolby/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
01/06/03 05:03 PM Subject: Re: classpath ./ChangeLog
./THANKYOU
Please respond to java/util/Reso...
tromey
>>>>> "Brian" == Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> This is true, but the code is harmless and I was inclined to
Brian> believe necessary for JRVM for some reason. If it isn't needed
Brian> (Dolby?) then surely revert that part.
I've got the patch here. I'll check it in after a couple days if I
don't hear anything.
Tom
_______________________________________________
Classpath mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath