>>>>> "Brian" == Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> I wonder if the regression showed up in 3.2.1 instead of 3.3 Brian> and 3.2 is okay? I don't remember any gcj changes going in to the 3.2 branch after 3.2 shipped. Maybe I forgot one though. I looked at the gcc/java/ChangeLog diffs from 3.2 to 3.2.1. There are some, but none of them look like they would affect compilation. I looked at the diffs between 3.2 and the rhl8 branch in the gcc cvs repository (the Red Hat gcc is a branch in the main gcc repository these days -- easier for everybody). There's a bunch of stuff in there. So it looks like this really is a regression. It's on my list to fix before 3.3. Not sure when I'll find the time yet. I don't know whether any fix could make it in to the next OS release (and if I did know I probably couldn't say anyway). Tom _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
