Oops. Forget to attach the file. Here it is.
Regards, Jeroen > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeroen Frijters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 09:12 > To: Alan Macek; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Alan Macek wrote: > > As a supplement to the recent constructor caching changes made to > > java.lang.Class.newInstance(), I would like to offer the > > following change which caches the default constructor more > > often. I am new to working with Classpath and I would like > > to hear why this change might or might not work. > > Please add it to the project if it seems to help. I have found a > > substantial performance increase with this change on code > > that is using newInstance(). > > The current code didn't make much sense (not sure why I wrote it that > way). Attached is a patch that hopefully makes more sense. > > I think your fix was correct too, but I had a work time > understanding my > own code so decided to clean it up a bit. > > Regards, > Jeroen > > > _______________________________________________ > Classpath mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath >
class.patch
Description: class.patch
_______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
