-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > | Christopher: Please use a valid From: address next time. > > Eh? Was [EMAIL PROTECTED] not given as the From address? Or do > you mean that I accidently send to you instead of the list, due to > the Reply-To header being missing. I see that mailman is being > used... perhaps the option to append a Reply-To header might be > nice? Or am I simply to inattentive? I don't mean that > sarcastically, either, because I am not, for all appearance a n00b, > but merely am not- er- as graceful as I should be. Not as attentive > to detail and such, if you catch my drift.
I mean the following I got from your (or your providers mail server): The original message was received at Tue, 8 Jul 2003 08:53:03 +0200 (MEST) from dynadsl-080-228-75-149.ewetel.net [80.228.75.149] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (reason: 553 sorry, your envelope sender is in my badmailfrom list (#5.7.1)) ----- Transcript of session follows ----- .. while talking to pk.greens.org.: >>> DATA <<< 553 sorry, your envelope sender is in my badmailfrom list (#5.7.1) 550 5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown <<< 503 RCPT first (#5.5.1) Michael - -- Homepage: http://www.worldforge.org/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/Coi9WSOgCCdjSDsRArZOAJ4jxsWIjYnYeKVuFZVjlDlVbaHhDwCglck8 zaRLGrbFCIG/f4LkdE3oyS0= =EaVk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath