>>>>> "Bryce" == Bryce McKinlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bryce> But I presume that for normal applications where security is Bryce> not required (ie System.getSecurityManager()), such checks are Bryce> avoided? Yes, the security manager itself walks the stack in this case, so if there is no security manager... There are also situations where the code unconditionally must find the caller and use that to do access checks, e.g. in Method. Also there are cases where you must find the caller's class loader, say in order to implement Class.forName. In libgcj these latter cases are also implemented by stack crawling. Tom _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
