>>>>> "Sascha" == Sascha Brawer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sascha> So, should a java compiler accept the following? Sascha> [ ... ] Sascha> javac 1.4.1 compiles this code, but gcj 3.2 complains about the throws Sascha> clause (of *Foo*.meth, which is a bit misleading). BTW, this bug is gone in current cvs. It might also be fixed in 3.3, but I didn't try it to see. Tom _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
