[I'm resending this, apologies if you get it twice] Andrew Haley wrote: > My only argument was against subclassing Error, because the Java > specification strongly implies that the only reasonable thing to do > when receiving an Error is issue a disgnostic and die.
I apologize for the confusion. > In the case of > unimplemented Classpath methods, this seems rather extreme. Why? I don't see how you can reasonably continue given that an arbitrary functionality that the application depends on is missing. Regards, Jeroen _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
