MK = Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: SB = Sascha Brawer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MK> [Patch for adding logging.properties] SB> If the only purpose of the patch is documentation, it really should have SB> more verbose comments. I don't think that the proposed patch would SB> actually help a sysadmin very much. What about the following? SB> SB> [New proposal for logging.properties; 1308 characters/37 lines] MK> Looks great. I will use this. This should go into libgcj too. Will MK> make sure this. One possible problem: The logging.properties file will be read whenever the java.util.logging framework is being used for the first time in a JVM; it's read by java.util.logging.LogManager.<clinit>, unless some system properties indicate to use a different file (or configuration via a custom class). So, a long config file will slow down the start-up time of every Java program that uses logging either directly or indirectly. I don't think the delay would be significant, but I thought I should mention this. -- Sascha Sascha Brawer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.dandelis.ch/people/brawer/ _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
