Hi, > Here is a new patch I propose. I've taken the suggestion > into account and fix another small error reporting problem.
I don't understand checkTypeConsistency, it looks odd and I'm having a hard time believing that it is correct. BTW, Shouldn't "nonPrimitive" be named "primitive"? Also, I really don't like the type checking being done in the various setXxxField methods, there is no reason to do this every time, it can be done once when the fields are mapped. Regards, Jeroen _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
