Hi, On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 23:19, Archie Cobbs wrote: > I've filed a couple of bugs which should be easy to fix but > have not been. It would be nice to get them fixed for 0.08. > If somebody gives me CVS write access I'll do it :-)
Thanks. I will gladly take you up on that offer! I see you already have paperwork on file with the FSF for all your past and future work so all I need is your savannah account (which I assume is archie172). Please send me a private (preferably signed) email and I will make you a developer of the savannah classpath project. Sadly communication about what to fix before 0.08 has been difficult because the mailinglist seems to have a delay of 48+ hours currently :( I have done most things I wanted for 0.08 (except get the ServerSocket.accept() fix for jamVM in), but haven't made any (test) release yet. > By the way, how come everyone else isn't complaining about #6938? > Why am I the only one who notices it? Does everybody else have a > bootstrap class path that contains the java class path as a subset? As far as I have seen most VMs have their own System/Application classloader. The SableVM developers were also rewriting it (to make sure ProtectionDomains were set correctly). So I guess everybody works around it instead of collaborating on the version in CVS. Probably only the Orp developers used this class as is for their VM. Cheers, Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
