Jeroen Frijters wrote: >>IMO, the cleanest approach is really the use of a byte array. > > But it is inefficient and hard to optimize. I don't see why RawData > doesn't give you the same capabilities as a byte array (as an extreme > example, you can replace Classpath's RawData with your own version that > wraps a byte array).
You miss an important point: it *has* to be VM independent! Classpath's JNI libraries should be VM independent. Do you expect RawData to work with, e.g., Sun VM?
Note: We are *NOT* talking about the VM*.java interface, here.
Etienne -- Etienne M. Gagnon, Ph.D. http://www.info.uqam.ca/~egagnon/ SableVM: http://www.sablevm.org/ SableCC: http://www.sablecc.org/
_______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
