Etienne Gagnon writes: > Andrew Haley wrote: > > Well, not exactly: I'm suggesting that we wrap all those longs in an > > opaque type. But otherwise, yes. > > So, how do you do opaque types, in Java?
You write the code using a class that wraps your native pointer: a class with a single member. > And how do you guarantee portability to 128bit systems? You tell people "if you have a pointer that won't fit in a jlong, you'll need to change three lines of code". Andrew. _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
