On Sat, 2004-07-03 at 04:21, Casey Marshall wrote: > >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew John Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Andrew> Anyway, the floor is over to you guys. Be gentle ;-) -- > Andrew> Andrew :-) > > I think this got as close to an authoritative answer/consensus as we > can expect to get on this issue: > > <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/classpath/2003-09/msg00226.html> > > Stub methods bad. No biscuit. Aaah -- the change of subject made me miss this one. I do see this as a bit of a step backwards -- for a stub to have been entered, the appropriate method signature must have been found, coded and committed. Also, its mere presence means that the method can be documented and tested against using Mauve, as well as called from other parts of Classpath. What is shouldn't do is just die silently.
Anyway, I'm happy to put in the yards to turn the nulls into whichever of these most people feel happy with -- just be prepared... Cheers, -- Andrew :-) Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html Value your freedom, or you will lose it, teaches history. `Don't bother us with politics' respond those who don't want to learn.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
