On Fri, 2004-07-09 at 10:24, Archie Cobbs wrote: > Robert Schuster wrote: > > What I want to say is: IMHO since Classpath already stepped into the 1.4 > > land it would not a good idea to primary support previous JDK versions. > > Classpath had to rip classes, methods and signatures off to be > > compatible with <1.4 again. If Classpath would officially head for full > > 1.4 compatibility this would a much better. Java 1.5 is a nice 'natural' > > barrier for adding its features because it needs a different syntax and > > therefore tools ... > > Sounds good to me. I vote we say "we strive for 1.4 compatibility" > but also say "we don't promise everything in 1.4 is implemented yet".
It would be nice if Mauve/japi/stck could essentially be used to indicate what's there and what works in a consolidated view, well actually better to indicate the holes really... but anyway. Brian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
