On Monday 12 July 2004 00:57, David Holmes wrote: > Hmmm. Given that the *only* distinction between the two forms of forName > are that the first implies initialize=true while the latter gives > initialize=false, I don't know why anyone would write that code. ???
Oops, you're right; for some reason I thought the third parameter had to be non-null. I should check the Java APIs before posting ... OTOH there are times where you want to call a method (getPackage(), findLibrary(), ...) of the appropriate classloader. Having a non-null bootstrap class loader would help here. -- Chris Gray /k/ Embedded Java Solutions Embedded & Mobile Java, OSGi http://www.kiffer.be/k/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] +32 3 216 0369 _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
