Michael Koch writes: > Am Mittwoch, 4. August 2004 12:45 schrieb Andrew Haley: > > Michael Koch writes: > > > Am Mittwoch, 4. August 2004 10:27 schrieb Andrew Haley: > > > > Well, that's the question: do we make Classpath harder to > > > > debug / read in order to optimize the performance of some > > > > unfree C compilers? > > > > > > It's not bad to support other compilers too but this should > > > should not be used to make the code unreadable and hard to > > > understand. If its hard to achieve better drop support for some > > > compilers. > > > > We weren't talking about dropping any support: merely a performance > > decrease for some old unfree compilers. > > As I understood Ingo this means dropping for him as the overhead is > too much for him.
This is such a weird conversation! Surely the bug is in the C compiler that still doesn't inline. gcc got inlining in 1988, I think with version 1.20. Andrew. _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
