Tom Tromey wrote: > > I propose we merge the branch to mainline when two criteria are met: > > 1. A majority of Classpath-using VM implementors agree that they > have access to a compiler suitable for compiling the branch.
Maybe you should pick an actual number instead of saying "majority"; otherwise people can claim that we aren't including **every** Classpath-using VM in our count. Alternatively, you could just say "When the following Classpath-using VM implementors agree that they have access to a compiler suitable for compiling the branch: Kaffe, SableVM, GCJ, JikesRVM, JamVM, and Kissme". Modify the list to be whomever you want, but IMHO if these guys can't use it then even if everyone else can, it isn't ready. -- James Damour (Suvarov454) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
