Mark Wielaard writes:
> > On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 10:27, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > I guess as long as we're stuck with C90 we can't use inline.
> > Am I right in thinking that GNU Classpath targets C90?
> > Yes. More accurately would probably be that we try to support platforms
> that still depend on gcc-2.95. This is not that uncommon.
Really? Not uncommon that platforms still depend on 2.95? Are these platforms that have been orphande due to lack of maintainers, or some other reason?
Current stable *BSD releases use gcc2. NetBSD is switching to 3.3.1 for 2.0. FreeBSD 5.3 may end up with gcc 3.3.3. OpenBSD 3.5 uses 2.95.3 for some arches, 3.3.2 on others.
I assume that gcc2 will be history in a year or two ;)
cheers, dalibor topic
_______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
