Am Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 19:29 schrieb Casey Marshall: > >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Michael> Am Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 01:39 schrieb Casey Marshall: > >> Ok, so if I understand this thread, the question is whether or > >> not to drop a fairly clumsy, ugly, and hard-to-debug > >> OS-dependent layer from Classpath that is really only used by a > >> non-free virtual machine. > >> > >> Why is this a difficult decision? What exactly does your > >> proprietary VM do for us? > > Michael> Thats not true. Its currently used by jamvm, kissme and I > think Michael> sablevm, probably more. > > Ok, I didn't know that. From the thread it didn't seem like it. > > I assume you mean it's used by them because it is in Classpath, not > because they needed it. But you seem to be trying to make it sound > more useful than it is; why?
Well its used by them because it is currently (?) the native implementation for some stuff in classpath. I dont want to make it more/less useful then it is. I just wanna have maintainable native code. Michael _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
