> Steven Augart writes: > I am wondering whether we want to rely upon > java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance supporting undocumented > behavior. Specifically, I found this line in our version of > Class.java: > > return constructor.newInstance(null); > > This strikes me as relying on Constructor.newinstance(Object[]) > accepting null in place of a zero-length array of Object.
This is specified behaviour as of 1.4: "If the number of formal parameters required by the underlying constructor is 0, the supplied initargs array may be of length 0 or null. " David Holmes _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
