Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:39:12 +0200, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 26. Oktober 2004 10:23 schrieb Arnaud Vandyck: [...] >> Yes, other worst alternatives exist. Also, note that GNU JAXP >> release cycle is not the same as classpath; and if we really want a >> separate module, I suppose it's possible to add some instructions >> to the make dist target or something. > > The question is: Does GNU JAXP wants/needs an extra release cylce when > its merged ? Personally I think thats a bad idea. Not a different release cycle, but if some people wants GNU JAXP but not all GNU CLASSPATH, maybe it could be kind to ship a separate module when it has evolved. -- Arnaud Vandyck ,= ,-_-. =. ((_/)o o(\_)) `-'(. .)`-' \_/ _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath