On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 08:40:36PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > If you think it is depcomp, could you try to replace it with the version > of 0.09 (if they are actually different).
0.09 and 0.11 version is the same but i'm also unable to compile the vanilla 0.11 version, since i have a bit newer version of depcomp in my tree. > In CVS I have simplified the native/jni/java-lang/Makefile.am a little. > But I don't know if this will help you. Tried this one, but does not make any difference. Without using the 2 lines depcomp stuff, in the PIC compilation `java_lang_VMSystem.o' is generated and then moved to `.libs/libjavalang_la-java_lang_VMSystem.o'. In the second compilation again `java_lang_VMSystem.o' is generated and then moved to `libjavalang_la-java_lang_VMSystem.o'. Seems quite correct. So, why using depcomp at all? I'm currently checking what depcomp does on sgi systems. TWISTI _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
